Vital Football

Latest Manchester City News

Should Mark Hughes Rethink His Transfer Policy?

Should Mark Hughes Rethink His Transfer Policy?

Google language translator


Around this time last week we all clung onto the words that Mark Hughes uttered when he mentioned the fact that their could be some new faces around the club.

The time has come and he has failed to deliver. I know bids where rejected and that`s not his fault, its down to the board and Gary Cook, but I wouldn`t have minded if bids where rejected for say, Villa, Barry and Buffon, but for Bids in the excess of £10 million plus to be rejected on such players as Bellamy, Parker and Santa Cruz?

I am ambitious and the club should be to! Wasting time and effort for players who can bring in "premiership experience" is all good and dandy when their the likes of Barry, Toure and of course our only signing, Bridge, but am I the only one who doesn`t seem to get why were putting in bids for mediocre players who would only be able to lift the club to about 6th at most. I mean Hughes is all for improving the quality in the side but Bellamy and Parker would only be on par with what we already have! Ok this means we will have suitable cover, but it will never get us fighting for the title. I have been a critic of Mark Hughes, but I do generally want him to bring success to club, because Manchester City are a good solid, professional club who have the best fans as a foothold to boost them further up the table, But I have to question the man`s ambition?

Why bid around £18 million pounds for Santa Cruz? Michael Owen is available even though the Toon boss has stated the opposite. He is not stupid and neither are the board of Newcastle. Why would they risk loosing a player for nothing when they can cash in around £12 million pounds? Manchester City then get a fantastic player who has not been the luckiest, rather than his old pal at Blackburn who`s had one season, and also looks a magnet for injuries?

Who am I to say what Hughes should do? I`m only a loyal and loving fan of a club that only wants what`s best for the club. Hughes is a Manchester United lover, who seems to be out of his depth. I have been getting a big of stick for slating Hughes over and over, but like I keep saying, I`m waiting for him to prove me wrong.

Hughes also seems to blame everybody except himself? I can bet anyone on this site, that if we perform badly against Portsmouth he will hide behind the "we have many first team players out injured" excuse.

Rant over, I look forward to Saturday, COME ON CITY!


Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.
www.papajohns.co.uk/football



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:amcollinz
Date:Friday January 9 2009
Time: 4:55PM

Comments

0
I think the point is that Hughes understands his situation better than us. While money talks, he knows it's virtually impossible for us to sign any big names players in this transfer window under the player(s) forces the move themselves. Simply put, no club wants to lose their players in this window, so he's going for a transfer policy by targetting players we have a chance of signing. On top of that, he's recognised that a lot of players in the team aren't motivated to play for him, and (perhaps quite rightly) wants them out as soon as possible. However, with no prospect of big name replacements, he's being forced to look for stop-gap signings who will want to play for him and will at least be better than reserve signings. To do this, he's simply targetting all the better players from his managerial past, because he knows they'll walk into the team and want to please him. At the moment, like it or not, signing average-standard players is about the only thing we can do, so rather than just kicking his heels and saying "it's Kaka or nothing", Hughes is trying to make a little progress by getting rid of the trouble makers. Is it a good transfer policy? Is it what's best for the club? Probably not, but I honestly think it's the only way we're going to sign any players at all right now.
Falastur
09/01/2009 17:25:00
0
I do think Hughes could come good and do think we need to buy the kind of players he is looking to buy as cover for current players so we can put out a strong team every game (as well as adding any top signings we can get) but i don't understand why fees are only being discussed now. I know its only nine days in but such figures could have been agreed before now. Diarra's deal to Madrid got sorted before and they just had to finish the paperwork once the window opened. It was Hughes that said he wanted the players sooner rather than later and with current injuries it would have been good to have more cover. I do think some of this will be due to Cook and the board but they know the situation. Pull yer fingers out guys, we need results, most top players won't come to a lower mid table team!
dave0
09/01/2009 17:55:00
0
I agree with both above comments, suspensions and injury, will now come more into the season and we are short of good squad players and little cover for certain positions, none of the top teams do any business in this window and the top teams want to keep their top players, lets get what we can to cover and move on up the table and look forward to the summer.
Buzz Lightyear
09/01/2009 18:59:00
0
While I am concerned about the quality of player for the money spoken about lets face it at the moment we are very light on in the squad numbers. We can build a more exciting team in summer if we have a solid base to work on
Doody
09/01/2009 19:32:00
0
Hughes is signing his friends, if they dont perform for him either - then we are in deep trouble. Cruz has scored 3 goals in 16 games this season.... same amount as jo. I give up at times with city :(
enzo city
09/01/2009 19:37:00
0
Villa,Messi,Kaka is impossible now even could be in Summer if u don't have any UEFA CUP or UCL.Not every one will run after money.
Saimon_blues
09/01/2009 19:46:00
0
People talk about the Diarra deal being done and dusted by Jan 1 well they didn't exactly get him on the cheap at £24m. No wonder it was done and dusted so early as Pompey were desperate for the money. They also concluded the deal for Defoe for £15m again not exactly cheap. I don't blame Hughes not being held to ransom for moderate players at double their market value. If I was him I would tell them all to get stuffed and continue shopping on the Continent.
alphieblues
09/01/2009 21:18:00
0
I still wonder why plans B and C havent been put into operation..... because he doesnt look like getting his first choices due to the high prices being turned down.......its already a third of the way though the window.......!!!!!
lincolnblue
10/01/2009 07:28:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Manchester City Articles

Highlights: Real Madrid 1-0 Manchester City

Fernando's own goal put Real Madrid through to an all-Spanish UEFA Champions League final against Atletico Madrid following an edgy semi-final against Manchester City...

Emotional Reactions Following Real Madrid Defeat

Manchester City limped out of the Champions League last night following a 1-0 defeat at the hands of Real Madrid.

Stats: Real Madrid v Manchester City

All the stats from Real Madrid (1) vs (0) Manchester City, The Etihad Stadium, Manchester, 4/5/16 20h45 CET Att: 78, 300

((LIVE STREAM)) Real Madrid v Manchester City

Manchester City FC are currently in Spain's capital ahead of tonight's Champions League semi-final second leg tie against Real Madrid, and we at VMC will bring you a LIVE...

Archived VMC Articles

VMC articles from
As featured on NewsNow: Real Madrid news
Real Madrid News 24/7  

Site Journalists

Tudor
Editor email
Profile
Johnny Baguette
no email
Profile
Pedmachine
no email
Profile
Sedgie
no email
Profile
Skoorb
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

City's performance, out of five against Real Madrid?
Suggested By: Tudor
Five1%
Four0%
Three14%
Two57%
One28%
ScoopDragon Premier League Network Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Leicester City 36 22 11 3 77 30
2 Spurs 36 19 13 4 70 39
3 Arsenal 36 19 10 7 67 25
4 Man City 36 19 7 10 64 30
5 Man Utd 35 17 9 9 60 12
6 West Ham 35 15 14 6 59 17
7 Southampton 36 16 9 11 57 14
8 Liverpool 35 15 10 10 55 11
9 Chelsea 35 12 12 11 48 7
10 Stoke 36 13 9 14 48 -14
11 Everton 35 10 14 11 44 6
12 Watford 35 12 8 15 44 -6
13 Swansea 36 11 10 15 43 -13
14 WBA 36 10 11 15 41 -14
15 AFC Bournemouth 36 11 8 17 41 -20
16 Crystal Palace 36 10 9 17 39 -10
17 Newcastle 36 8 9 19 33 -25
18 Sunderland 35 7 11 17 32 -18
19 Norwich 35 8 7 20 31 -26
R Aston Villa 36 3 7 26 16 -45
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Manchester City Results (view all)

Manchester City Fixtures (view all)

May 8 2016 4:00PM : Arsenal (H)
Barclays Premier League
May 15 2016 3:00PM : Swansea City (a)
Barclays Premier League

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.Tudor73
2.Buzz Lightyear68
3.Colin Is The King56
4.Bluedub40
5.fifthcolumnblue38
6.kennyclementstache33
7.Skoorb30
8.Johnny Baguette21
9.seac17
10.Brutto15